Posted by Russell Daniels on October 14, 2015 at 2:23 PM
Nebraska has a state legislature that is 71% republican. What does that mean to you? That kind of figure would usually imply a lot of things. It's a red state. Conservative values are upheld and republicans call the shots. But that is not what's going on in Nebraska. Nebraska's state legislature can serve as a real example and model of democracy and political innovation. This is a positive example of how a state legislature can be effective. Real, tough conversations can be had without the whole system shutting down over partisanship. It breaks down the simple, archaic notion of "red states" vs. "blue states," because in Nebraska real stuff is getting done.
Read more
Posted by Al Benninghoff on September 18, 2015 at 12:00 PM
Michigan State Representative Martin Howrylak is frustrated. He keeps having to go back to his constituents to explain why the legislature can’t pass commonsense legislation: politics keeps getting in the way.
But now, he’s doing something about it. He’s proposing legislation which would not only combine both the House and Senate into one body of 110 members, but it would also enact nonpartisan elections for state offices in Michigan; a system similar to Nebraska’s nonpartisan, unicameral legislature.
And, he’s getting more support than he anticipated.
Read more
Posted by Russell Daniels on September 16, 2015 at 12:59 PM
Senator Rand Paul just paid a lot of money to change election law in Kentucky. People throw around the phrase “buying an election” a lot but never has a phrase been more appropriate. Paul wants to be able to run for President and also keep his Senate seat. Under Kentucky law that wasn’t allowed, so Paul decided he would pay a lot of money to change the rules. Kentucky is switching over from the primary system to a caucus. The senator has already paid $250,000 and has promised at least another $200,000 to the Kentucky GOP.
Read more
Posted by Zach Handler on September 16, 2015 at 12:37 PM
Ever since I was a teenager, I was very passionate about politics and I have always identified as progressive. Moreover, I always had thought the best way to express that was by supporting Democratic candidates. As a high school student, I told the field director of a campaign for a Democratic U.S. Senator that I was in college so that I could work as an intern.
After graduation, I even took a semester off before college to work for an organization that was supporting Democratic candidates. I was disgusted by the policies and rhetoric of my U.S. Congressman Todd Akin (you know—this guy), George W. Bush, and other conservatives. I felt the best way to fight them was to support the other team. Go Democrats!
Read more
Posted by John Opdycke on September 15, 2015 at 10:42 AM
People ask me all the time “what’s the connection between open primaries and the Trump and Sanders surge?
My answer - “Everything and Nothing” - often times infuriates my questioners. But I stick by my answer. Because the world we live in is not so cut and dry anymore.
Everything. The American people are angry. You don’t need a crystal ball to see that. We’ve been lied to repeatedly by leaders from both political parties who excel at "divide and conquer" politics, led into unsupportable wars, seen our tax dollars wasted, problems fester, and our human potential undeveloped.
Trump and Sanders tap into that anger. Open primaries is not “tapping” - we are “movement building” to enact structural change to the system itself so that voters can express their anger in new and more developmental ways.
Read more
Posted by Kellie Ryan on September 08, 2015 at 3:59 PM
Listen to Open Primaries President John Opdycke on #WeThePeople LIVE. John joins fellow guests Akilah Hughes and Joe Zimmerman in an entertaining and candid discussion on artificial intelligence, the stories that dominated the summer, Donald Trump and term limits.
Read more
Posted by Kellie Ryan on September 03, 2015 at 5:47 PM
Co-author of A Quiet Revolution: The Early Successes of California's Top Two Nonpartisan Primary Jason Olson recently interviewed with ReasonTV to discuss the report and why nonpartisan elections in California have had such a major impact.
Read more
Posted by Buz Sobel on September 02, 2015 at 2:38 PM
I’m an independent voter in the State of Arizona. I recently voted early in the primary election. I choose to be an independent because I am not a soldier for either party. In the Arizona primary election, a registered independent must vote either on a Democratic or a Republican ballot. This seems counter intuitive, but it is the law. Since I generally, but not predictably, take a liberal stance, I was limited to accepting a Democratic primary ballot. This was not a good experience. The ballot was a page full of government offices to be voted on. There was only one candidate listed for each office, with the exception of positions with two seats available and since you were allowed to vote for two candidates there were two listed. There were no alternatives on the entire ballot. Was that actually a vote I placed?
Read more
Posted by Kellie Ryan on August 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM
Presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have already made voting rights and election reform major areas of focus of their presidential campaigns. However, neither candidate has addressed that 42% of Americans, who identify as politically independent, are being disenfranchised by our current election system.
Bernie Sanders, an independent, has not even addressed that in many states the people he represents are not able to vote for him in the primary election without changing their party affiliation.
Open Primaries believes that no American should be required to join a political party to exercise their right to vote.
Read more
Posted by John Opdycke on August 25, 2015 at 10:06 AM
This article was published by John Opdycke and Jessie Fields for Newsweek.
You have to hand it to Bernie Sanders. He’s defying expectations across the board. He’s giving Hillary Clinton a run for her money that few expected. He’s ahead of her in the polls in New Hampshire and showing no sign of losing momentum.
Senator Sanders is popular because he is speaking out aggressively about income inequality and a disastrous foreign policy. But his support actually grows out of a deeper discord, one that goes beyond specific issues.
He has tapped into roiling public anger at a corrupt and insulated political establishment that has acquiesced in war and greed without the consent of the governed. Sanders is popular because he is taking on a corrupt and insulated political establishment, not because he has the “correct” line on this or that issue.
Read more
